At 06:16 PM 11/23/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> > What I've done doesn't eliminate (or shouldn't) the desire for a comp.*
> > hierarchy of groups for postgresql, it just means that the what will end
> > up still being considered bogus groups will be able to still be accessible
> > by those that wish to ...
>
>BTW, you indicated that one of the reasons pressing you to move was that
>Google had dropped indexing services for the comp.* groups. Have they
>given you an indication that they would index pgsql.*, or are we just
>out of luck on that service?
You'll be _WAY_ out of luck. But that's what Marc wants. So why complain?
