Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071001291014mceb9189v87a2063dfd732060@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Two months on, there is
>> zero sign of any activity on that front
>
> I'm surprised that you call 14 commits in 28 days following a publicly
> available priority list: "zero sign of activity".
>
> Further discussion seems pointless.

Wow, that was an awesome way to quote what I said out of context and
make it sound like I said something ridiculous.  The problem I and
others have is not with the quantity of your commits but with the
issues you are choosing (not) to address.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns