Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chao Li
Subject Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 616C53FD-5C63-44C0-99CB-D51074A6DE22@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
Hi John,

Thanks for working on v9.

On Sep 18, 2025, at 15:59, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:


It'll be a good idea to communicate how to detect (unlikely but not
impossible) incompatibilities for existing systems, but I don't think
committing needs to wait for that piece.

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
<v9-0001-Update-GB18030-encoding-from-version-2000-to-2022.patch>

V9 looks good to me. I am absolutely fine with removing the table of mapping changes.

When you say “communicate how to detect incompatibility for existing systems”, what would be the communication channel? I am actually very new to the PG development community, your guidance will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: someone else to do the list of acknowledgments
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication