Re: New "blob" re-introduced? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: New "blob" re-introduced?
Date
Msg-id 6284C231-0F06-4373-9F6D-1BD7630CE2F9@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to New "blob" re-introduced?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 24 Feb 2023, at 08:31, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't we use "large object" instead of "blob" in the message?

Nice catch, it should be "large object" as per the linked discussion.  There
are also a few more like:

-       if (cfclose(ctx->LOsTocFH) != 0)
-               pg_fatal("could not close LOs TOC file: %m");
+       if (EndCompressFileHandle(ctx->LOsTocFH) != 0)
+               pg_fatal("could not close blobs TOC file: %m");

I'll go ahead and fix them, thanks for the report!

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: New "blob" re-introduced?
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: New "blob" re-introduced?