Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date
Msg-id 65fba8b5-5256-151a-d37f-5c6855203449@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
Responses Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/8/21 7:40 PM, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:22 AM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>>
>> Paul, you can submit to the next CF when you are ready with a new patch.
> 
> Thanks David! I've made a lot of progress but still need to finish
> support for CASCADE on temporal foreign keys. I've been swamped with
> other things, but hopefully I can get something during this current
> CF.

The next CF starts on July 1 so you have some time.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables
Next
From: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)"
Date:
Subject: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures