Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> OK. Please send in a patch to either do that or switch this call to use
>> noError = false. Or possibly both: shouldn't there be some other signal
>> path that tells the worker whether instrumentation is needed? I'll
>> leave it alone pending your investigation.
> Here's a patch do to both.
LGTM, pushed.
regards, tom lane