Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
Date
Msg-id 6e4552f6-14fe-e21f-17fb-560b263c9708@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/24/17 07:00, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Fair point.  In that case there are a few others we should consider
> moving down too for consistency, like in the attached.

> Thanks, that is much tidier.  Done that way in the attached.
> 
> Here also is a small addition to your TAP test which exercises the
> non-NULL code path because slapd rejects TLS by default with a
> diagnostic message.  I'm not sure if this is worth adding, since it
> doesn't actually verify that the code path is reached (though you can
> see that it is from the logs).

Committed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] oversight in EphemeralNamedRelation support