> It seems to me reasonable to move size check above CRC computation. However, it seems suspicious to me to run a test
thatallocates 1Gb in `make check`. Maybe, there are places that are not exercised too often. Perhaps recovery tests or
somethinglike that.
Hi Andrey,
I share your concern about memory consumption and also agree recovery
tests look like the right place for this test.
So I split the patch into two - the change proper and the converted TAP
test, guarded by PG_TEST_EXTRA. Attaching both patches.
---
Sergey
