Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary
Date
Msg-id 702138.1752514835@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary
List pgsql-docs
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> If we accept that we use the words statement and command interchangeably
> then the sole remaining use of command here sticks out because now we have
> to explain why commands are different from statements.  I'd rather just
> remove the parenthetical.  It's poorly clarifying a point that it seems you
> don't want to clarify more fully here.

[ shrug... ]  I'm inclined to go back to the "command message" wording
then.  I don't find "client-issued statement" to be helpful at all;
in particular, it's flat wrong for the multi-statement-query-message
case, because surely all those statements are client-issued.  I'm okay
with this text leaving out nitpicky details, but it should leave the
reader with a mental model that more or less matches reality.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary