Possible typo in nodeAgg.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hou, Zhijie
Subject Possible typo in nodeAgg.c
Date
Msg-id 7065ae4343494632bdd3ac7226d52ae6@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Possible typo in nodeAgg.c
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

In /src/backend/executor/nodeAgg.c

I found the following comment still use work mem,
Since hash_mem has been introduced, Is it more accurate to use hash_mem here ?

@@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ hash_agg_set_limits(double hashentrysize, double input_groups, int used_bits,
     /*
      * Don't set the limit below 3/4 of hash_mem. In that case, we are at the
      * minimum number of partitions, so we aren't going to dramatically exceed
-     * work mem anyway.
+     * hash_mem anyway.

Best regards,
houzj



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong statistics for size of XLOG_SWITCH during pg_waldump.
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add extra statistics to explain for Nested Loop