On 11/26/18 10:35 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2018-11-26 10:18:52 -0500, sfrost@snowman.net wrote:
>>
>>> This came originally to check that recovery.conf handles correctly
>>> its recovery targets when multiple ones are defined with the last
>>> one winning […]
>>
>> Ugh, no, I don't agree that this property makes sense to keep and
>> since we're making these changes, I'd argue that it's exactly the
>> right time to do away with that.
>
> I strongly agree with everything Stephen said here.
+1.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
