Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit
Date
Msg-id 7269.1024073912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> This looks good --- but Bruce, when you apply it don't forget to bump
>> catversion.h.

> Yep, thanks, got it.  Hold, do we need to bump catversion for changes
> that add new functionality, or just ones that make the system broken
> without it?  Would this break an existing installation?

Yes, because the catalog entry for current_schemas wouldn't match the C
code.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: guc.c and postgresql.conf.sample constistency checker
Next
From: Paul Bethe
Date:
Subject: Re: New Patch For CallableStmt (against current CVS)