20.01.2025 07:36, Tom Lane пишет:
> Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im> writes:
>> I wanted to use the list api from pg_list.h. It has special implementations for
>> int, oid, pointer, and xid types, which help with lower code overhead (no need
>> to create structures whose sole member is of one of these types) and better
>> performance. So I was wondering if there's any interest in having a similar API
>> for int64 type, as well.
>
> This has been discussed before, and we've felt that it wasn't worth
> the additional code duplication. I would not favor approaching this
> with the mindset of lets-copy-and-paste-all-the-code.
>
> However: it might be interesting to think about having just two
> underlying implementations, one for 32-bit datums and one for 64-bits,
> with the existing APIs becoming macros-with-casts wrappers around the
> appropriate one of those. That line of attack might lead to
> physically less code not more. The devil's in the details though.
There's masterpiece typesafe std-C compliant macros+functions
implementation of vector:
https://github.com/rxi/vec/
It wraps any struct with "T *data; int length; int capacity" fields, and
uses `sizeof(*(v)->data)` to instruct wrapped allocation/move functions.
Although it could not be directly adapted to List*, and it is less
sophisticated considering "mutation during iteration", it could be
really useful in many places, where List* used not as a Node, but just
as dynamic array.
