Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-performance

Storage test was simple, but the data (seconds taken) for INSERT test for PG vs Oracle for 1, 2, 3,4 and 5 indexes was:
PG:
25
30
37
42
45


Oracle:

33
43
50
65
68
Rows inserted: 100,000
Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL procedures. But performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time back so I do not have data for that right now.


From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Mon, October 25, 2010 11:56:27 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello Experts,
> My application uses Oracle DB, and makes use of OCI interface.
> I have been able to develop similar interface using postgreSQL library.
> However, I have done some tests but results for PostgreSQL have not been
> encouraging for a few of them.

Tell us more about your tests and results please.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Kupershmidt
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle