Re: Index (primary key) corrupt? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rob Sargent
Subject Re: Index (primary key) corrupt?
Date
Msg-id 795E8AB6-CE90-4BEE-B410-BD2B15E9DC92@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index (primary key) corrupt?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general

> On Sep 20, 2025, at 9:58 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
> On 9/20/25 09:26, Rob Sargent wrote:
>>> So the problem goes away once you’ve reindexed yet you claim it’s consistent? What are you doing to get the problem
torecur after you’ve done reindex to make it work? 
>>> David
>> I was assuming the OP has  a dump of the affected condition and is restoring (and perhaps re-fixing).  No?
>
> From this post:
>
>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AS2PR05MB107548567EEDAAB3AF74A6C59EF11A%40AS2PR05MB10754.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
>
> "
> > Is the PK definition in the pg_dump file? For plain text format can you grep/find it?
>
>
> It is in neither, that’s why I'm sure it doesn't get exported. After a REINDEX statement it is.
>
>
> >How is the dump file being restored?
>
>
> As the code to generate the index is not in the dumpfile this seems irrelevant to me.
> "
>
> Make of that what you will.
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

I don’t see the complete REINDEX command used but from the output of the query on pg_index it looks like reindex using
indexname would succeed, no? Again assuming this was done against the dump which may or may not have matched a grep
attempt.Lord knows I’ve had my share of false negatives with grep.  




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Index (primary key) corrupt?