Re: Win32 hard crash problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Win32 hard crash problem
Date
Msg-id 7F574457-2DCA-4832-8496-8544C5BC49D7@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32 hard crash problem  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Win32 hard crash problem
List pgsql-hackers
On 5-Sep-06, at 7:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
>>> On 5-Sep-06, at 6:05 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> Yes they are using a connection pool. A java based one.
>>> Since java has it's own protocol implementation, this is totally   
>>> unrelated to any libpq error messages.
>> Another important point that we've not been given information on:
>> when pgAdmin/libpq starts failing like this, exactly what is  
>> happening
>> with the connection pool?  Is it still able to issue queries, and
>> if not what happens exactly?
>
> No, when this happens everything stops. The only thing they get  
> back is that message until they reboot the server. The web app (via  
> java/connection pool), pgAdmin both give the same error.
>
> Which now that I think about it, seems odd if the message is coming  
> from libpq yes?
Yes, this is very odd, AFICS, this message does not exist in the java  
driver. So.... it would be interesting to get the actual logs from  
the client.

>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>>             regards, tom lane
>> ---------------------------(end of  
>> broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
> -- 
>
>    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
>    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
>              http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 hard crash problem
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: @ versus ~, redux