Re: lazy detoasting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: lazy detoasting
Date
Msg-id 7d10686f-4190-fe75-6e42-adb4223f3fe0@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lazy detoasting  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/10/2018 05:04 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:

> If I'm a function, and ... I found [the datum] myself, say by an
> SPI query within the function, usually that's at a level of abstraction
> somewhere above what-snapshot-was-used-in-the-scan.

It looks like for that case (since the commit 08e261cbc that Tom
mentioned earlier), there can sometimes be a portal->holdSnapshot
that will be the right one.

-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martín Marqués
Date:
Subject: vacuum_cost_limit doc description patch
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups