Re: downgrade some aclchk.c errors to internal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: downgrade some aclchk.c errors to internal
Date
Msg-id 7f033bbd-953d-40da-ae17-7dd36e9db3ed@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: downgrade some aclchk.c errors to internal  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 14.01.25 10:10, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-Dec-20, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
>> On 20.12.24 12:47, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> In aclchk.c, there are a few error messages that use ereport() but it
>>> seems like they should be internal error messages.  Moreover, they are
>>> using get_object_class_descr(), which is only meant for internal errors.
>>>   (For example, it does not have translation support.)  I dug through
>>> this and it seems like these errors are indeed not or no longer user-
>>> facing, so we can downgrade them to internal.  See commit messages in
>>> the attached patches for further explanations.
>>
>> There was a mistake in the second patch, I had missed some other callers
>> that I have fixed up here.  Amended patch set attached.
> 
> LGTM.
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] Downgrade errors in object_ownercheck() to internal
> [...]
> 
>> For the has_xxx_privilege functions, the error has not been
>> user-facing since commit 403ac226ddd.  The remaining users are
>> pg_database_size() and pg_tablespace_size().  The call stack here is
>> pretty deep and this dependency is not obvious.  Here we can put in an
>> explicit existence check with a bespoke error message early in the
> 
> I'd add a comment on why we have that, otherwise it seems a bit random:
> 
> +   /*
> +    * Not needed for correctness, but avoid non-user-facing error later
> +    * message if the [database,whatever] doesn't exist.
> +    */

Committed with that change.  Thanks.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?