Hi,
On 2025-01-19 09:37:54 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:14:02PM -0800, Jacob Brazeal wrote:
> > Sounds good! v3 attached.
>
> Removal sounds good to me. Any objections from anybody?
>
> Andres, perhaps you have some experience using that and would prefer
> keep them and make them work?
I think they're pretty useless, tbh. There's too many buffers that just
printing them out is helpful - pg_buffercache is going to be a better
bet. When debugging issues where pg_buffercache isn't an option (e.g. because
it's a hang that doesn't allow running pg_buffercache), using
DebugPrintBufferRefcount() is much more targeted.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
