Hi,
On 2025-08-15 15:31:47 -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 3:28 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > >I'm not worried about it. Andres' "not waiting for already-in-progress
> > >IO" patch was clearly just a prototype. Just thought it was worth
> > >noting here.
> >
> > Are you confident in that? Because the patch should be extremely cheap in that case.
>
> I'm pretty confident.
>
> > What precisely were you testing?
>
> I'm just running my usual generic pgbench SELECT script, with my usual
> settings (so no direct I/O, but with iouring).
I see absolutely no effect of the patch with shared_buffers=1GB and a
read-only scale 200 pgbench at 40 clients. What data sizes, shared buffers
etc. were you testing?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
