On 06.12.21 12:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
> FWIW, I am not on board with changing build semantics or any
> assumptions the header installation relies on either, but I could see
> a point in switching back to INSTALL_DATA instead of cp to be
> consistent with the rest of the build, iff the argument made back in
> 2005 about the performance of this code path does not hold anymore.
I think you will find that it is still very slow.
