On 20/9/2024 04:36, David Rowley wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sept 2024 at 04:47, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Excuse me if I made noise in vain. After discovering the limits of the
>> Memoize node, I realized that volatile functions are allowed under the
>> Memoize.
> I'm not sure if it's a good idea to penalise your case when we're not
> all that consistent to start with. Is this causing some sort of
> breakage?
As I've said before, I just discovered the feature's limits and realised
that I don't actually understand the idea of volatility checking: even
in the get_memoize_path, we spend cycles checking the target list and
base restrictions for such functions. Is it necessary there?
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
