Re: row filtering for logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Subject | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Date | |
Msg-id | 849ee491-bba3-c0ae-cc25-4fce1c03f105@enterprisedb.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: row filtering for logical replication ("Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>) |
Responses |
Re: row filtering for logical replication
Re: row filtering for logical replication Re: row filtering for logical replication |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I took a look at this patch, which seems to be in CF since 2018. I have only some basic comments and observations at this point: 1) alter_publication.sgml I think "expression is executed" sounds a bit strange, perhaps "evaluated" would be better? 2) create_publication.sgml Why is the patch changing publish_via_partition_root docs? That seems like a rather unrelated bit. The <literal>WHERE</literal> clause should probably contain only columns that are part of the primary key or be covered by <literal>REPLICA ... I'm not sure what exactly is this trying to say. What does "should probably ..." mean in practice for the users? Does that mean something bad will happen for other columns, or what? I'm sure this wording will be quite confusing for users. It may also be unclear whether the condition is evaluated on the old or new row, so perhaps add an example illustrating that & more detailed comment, or something. E.g. what will happen with UPDATE departments SET active = false WHERE active; 3) publication_add_relation Does this need to build the parse state even for whereClause == NULL? 4) AlterPublicationTables I wonder if this new reworked code might have issues with subscriptions containing many tables, but I haven't tried. 5) OpenTableList I really dislike that the list can have two different node types (Relation and PublicationTable). In principle we don't actually need the extra flag, we can simply check the node type directly by IsA() and act based on that. However, I think it'd be better to just use a single node type from all places. I don't see why not to set whereClause every time, I don't think the extra if saves anything, it's just a bit more complex. 5) CloseTableList The comment about node types seems pointless, this function has no flag and the element type does not matter. 6) parse_agg.c ... are not allowed in publication WHERE expressions I think all similar cases use "WHERE conditions" instead. 7) transformExprRecurse The check at the beginning seems rather awkward / misplaced - it's way too specific for this location (there are no other p_expr_kind references in this function). Wouldn't transformFuncCall (or maybe ParseFuncOrColumn) be a more appropriate place? Initially I was wondering why not to allow function calls in WHERE conditions, but I see that was discussed in the past as problematic. But that reminds me that I don't see any docs describing what expressions are allowed in WHERE conditions - maybe we should explicitly list what expressions are allowed? 8) pgoutput.c I have not reviewed this in detail yet, but there seems to be something wrong because `make check-world` fails in subscription/010_truncate.pl after hitting an assert (backtrace attached) during "START_REPLICATION SLOT" in get_rel_sync_entry in this code: /* Release tuple table slot */ if (entry->scantuple != NULL) { ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(entry->scantuple); entry->scantuple = NULL; } So there seems to be something wrong with how the slot is created. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: