Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill - Mailing list pgsql-general

From merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
Subject Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill
Date
Msg-id 86k5zg7vjp.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill  (John Meyer <john.l.meyer@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill
List pgsql-general
>>>>> "John" == John Meyer <john.l.meyer@gmail.com> writes:

John> I'd say fine, but why discuss the flaws of MySQL on a PostgreSQL list?
John> If you want to correct it, why not put that flaw on a MySQL list.  And
John> yes, I agree, there is a difference between pointing out a legitimate
John> flaw and simply bashing for bashing's sake.

It's a valid discussion here (although better on -advocacy), because it helps
me have the right facts to present to clients about whether they should stay
with a legacy database in MySQL vs upgrading to a modern PostgreSQL.

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John Meyer
Date:
Subject: Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill
Next
From: "Shashank Tripathi"
Date:
Subject: Re: More grist for the PostgreSQL vs MySQL mill