"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that
>> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue.
>
> Um ... which ones exactly? I don't see *anything* in the current queue
> that is utterly without issues
I didn't mean they were without issues. Only that they weren't complex patches
requiring broad knowledge of many parts of the system.
Anyways, I think we're well on our way to improving the situation so I don't
want to drag out my negativity any longer.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
