Re: mark/restore failures on unsorted merge joins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Andrew Gierth |
---|---|
Subject | Re: mark/restore failures on unsorted merge joins |
Date | |
Msg-id | 87ft4y4lxm.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: mark/restore failures on unsorted merge joins (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: mark/restore failures on unsorted merge joins
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: Tom> Oh, sorry, I misread your comment to be that you wanted to add a Tom> field to IndexAmRoutine. You're right, the real issue here is that Tom> ExecSupportsMarkRestore lacks any convenient access to the needed Tom> info, and we need to add a bool to IndexOptInfo to fix that. Tom> I don't see any compelling reason why you couldn't add the field Tom> at the end in the back branches; that's what we usually do to Tom> avoid ABI breaks. Although actually (counts fields...) it looks Tom> like there's at least one pad byte after amcanparallel, so you Tom> could add a bool there without any ABI consequence, resulting in a Tom> reasonably natural field order in all branches. I guess that's close enough; this should suffice then. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execAmi.c b/src/backend/executor/execAmi.c index e2154ba86a..0c10f1d35c 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execAmi.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execAmi.c @@ -417,6 +417,11 @@ ExecSupportsMarkRestore(Path *pathnode) { case T_IndexScan: case T_IndexOnlyScan: + /* + * Not all index types support mark/restore. + */ + return castNode(IndexPath, pathnode)->indexinfo->amcanmarkpos; + case T_Material: case T_Sort: return true; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c index 52c01eb86b..3e94256d34 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/plancat.c @@ -284,6 +284,8 @@ get_relation_info(PlannerInfo *root, Oid relationObjectId, bool inhparent, info->amhasgettuple = (amroutine->amgettuple != NULL); info->amhasgetbitmap = amroutine->amgetbitmap != NULL && relation->rd_tableam->scan_bitmap_next_block != NULL; + info->amcanmarkpos = (amroutine->ammarkpos != NULL && + amroutine->amrestrpos != NULL); info->amcostestimate = amroutine->amcostestimate; Assert(info->amcostestimate != NULL); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/pathnodes.h b/src/include/nodes/pathnodes.h index abe6f570e3..5a10c1855d 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/pathnodes.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/pathnodes.h @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ struct IndexOptInfo bool amhasgettuple; /* does AM have amgettuple interface? */ bool amhasgetbitmap; /* does AM have amgetbitmap interface? */ bool amcanparallel; /* does AM support parallel scan? */ + bool amcanmarkpos; /* does AM support mark/restore? */ /* Rather than include amapi.h here, we declare amcostestimate like this */ void (*amcostestimate) (); /* AM's cost estimator */ };
pgsql-hackers by date: