"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Also, for completeness, the causes I wrote off as not interesting
> (anymore, in some cases):
>
> missing BYTE_ORDER definition for Solaris | 2007-01-10 14:18:23 | 1
What is this BYTE_ORDER macro? Should I be using it instead of the
AC_C_BIGENDIAN test in configure for the packed varlena patch?
> row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test | 2007-02-10 03:00:02 | 3
Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? If not shouldn't the test get
an ORDER BY clause so that it will reliably pass on future versions?
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
