Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 08:43, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed feedback! Here is the rebased version.
>>
>
> I took another look at this and I think it's in reasonable shape.
>
> I'm attaching an update, rebasing it on top of 9be4e5d293.
Thank you Dean.
> Also it was missing a required update to the meson.build file --
> that's the immediate cause of the other cfbot failures.
OK, great to know this one, I should have paid more attention to cfbot.
> The rest is just cosmetic tidying up, fixing indentation, tweaking
> comments, and the like. I also hacked on the docs a bit -- the
> synopsis only listed one of the new function signatures for some
> reason. After fixing that, I think it's sufficient to just list one
> usage example.
That looks better now, more concise and expressive sentences.
--
Best Regards
Andy Fan
