On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that one probably needs review from -core.
-core's role is not quite what you think. We essentially do project
management. The review I think you're suggesting is from a committer
(this is a little overlap between those groups of course).
> It's been
> extensively discussed on -hackers several times already, and is on
> version 19, so I doubt there are obvious bugs remaining.
It's been discussed, but I don't think anyone has done any actual code
review though.
> Arguably it could use additional performance testing, though I think
> Greg has done quite a bit already, but I'm not in a good position to
> undertake that either for a patch of this type.
I share an office with him, so I can say that yes, he has done a good
amount of testing (in fact, I don't think people realise just how much
R&D went into this patch)!
I'd appreciate a code review of it, but if you really don't want to do
that, please see if you can help Jeff out with the GIN patches.
Thanks!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
