Re: Application name patch - v4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Application name patch - v4
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10912010833o7cc6f0acs39ed2f07ac6b6419@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Application name patch - v4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> If people are agreed that double connect is a better alternative

I still kinda like 'SET DEFAULT', but I'm far from wed to it. A double
connect certainly seems like it would be better than the
inconsistency.

> I'm willing to go look at how to make it happen.

That's good, 'cos I'm sure it'll end up being a whole lot less ugly
than if I did it :-)

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO`s gimme_tree function so that it always finds a