Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
Date
Msg-id 9469.1341285912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Um, doesn't that require nonrectangular arrays?

> Doh.  You're right: I keep forgetting that arrays have to be rectangular.

> Any suggestions on a sensible way to represent this?

Are there likely to be enough entries that storage efficiency actually
matters?  If not, we could use a 2xN array of {key,allowed_value} pairs,
that is

{{thingy,item1},{thingy,item2},{otherthingy,foo},{otherthingy,bar}}

Or perhaps push these out into a separate table, along the lines
ofoid    key    allowed_value
and use an oidvector to list the selected values in a trigger entry?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: huge tlb support
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)