Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
Date
Msg-id 952445.1758030310@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:51 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Oh!  Yeah, that is surely broken now.

> This patch seems to work OK here.  The deform code is a little tricky
> as you have to think carefully about which places need TypeDatum and
> which need TypeSizeT in llvmjit_deform.c, since the v_offp variable
> really is size_t.  Tested on Debian 13 with i386 packages installed.

Thanks for doing that.  It looks generally plausible to my eye,
but I'm hardly qualified to do a detailed review.

> More changes would be needed if Datum is changed into a struct.

I can only imagine us doing that as a compile option to help
catch errors.  Our ambition need not reach to making the compile
option play with --with-llvm, perhaps.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed