Re: Updating Ubuntu package info - Mailing list pgadmin-support
From | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Updating Ubuntu package info |
Date | |
Msg-id | 9837222c1002040119p3a97ba22obb02ab83d658c44b@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Updating Ubuntu package info (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Updating Ubuntu package info
|
List | pgadmin-support |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:16, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 09:06, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> Le 04/02/2010 04:23, Greg Smith a écrit : >>>> Problem #3: Given the general popularity of Ubuntu and what I'm seeing >>>> in the version history here, I think it would also be appropriate to >>>> warn that versions of pgAdmin3 before the upcoming 1.12 do not support >>>> connecting to PostgreSQL 9.0 databases (the '"column "datconfig" does >>>> not exist' issue) on this page too. >>> >>> We can do that. That's not something we usually do, this kind of issue >>> happens for every release of PostgreSQL and pgAdmin. You need the latest >>> major pgAdmin release to work with the latest major PostgreSQL release. >>> Moreover, since 1.10, they even have a message box telling the user than >>> PostgreSQL releases after 8.4 could be incompatible with their pgAdmin >>> release. 1.12 will have the same for post-9.0 releases. >> >> I think this one may be big enough to consider backpatching just this one check. >> >> Not for Ubuntu, but for users in general :-) IIRC it's the first time >> we die so completely and early - previously at least some things would >> work fine :) >> >> However, do we know if Ubuntu even picks up the minor releases? > > We don't produce minor releases of old versions so backpatching seems > a little pointless. We still produce minor releases to 1.10, no? I certainly don't suggest we back-patch past that, but we do backpatch to the *latest* stable branch. >>>> I think somebody (and I'm >>>> getting that feeling it's going to be me) should figure out how to build >>>> a backport of the pgadmin HEAD that goes at least a couple of versions >>>> back to help out with this. I personally really need a PG9.0 compatible >>>> Jaunty build for example. >>>> >>> >>> I can tell you that this "someone" is not me. I don't have the time to >>> work on this. >> >> Yeah. Having a "pgadmin-daily" PPA for Ubuntu would certainly be >> pretty neat, but so far nobody has volunteered the time... > > The one thing we don't want is a vendor patched version of pgAdmin > getting out there. Older versions of Ubuntu (and to a lesser extent > Debian) caused us extreme amounts of pain due to vendor patches in wx > that basically broke it. I don't want them doing the same with our > code, no matter how simple the patch may seem Yeah, +1. Certainly don't want that. But I don't think that's what Gregs suggesting. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
pgadmin-support by date: