On 2024-10-08 18:39, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2024/10/07 21:51, torikoshia wrote:
>>> While reviewing, I also noticed that the check for
>>> "opts_out->binary && opts_out->on_error != COPY_ON_ERROR_STOP"
>>> is similarly placed before setting the defaults, which might not
>>> be correct. This check should probably be moved as well.
>>> Additionally, the comment mentioning "must do these two" should be
>>> updated to "must do these three." These changes should be handled
>>> in a separate patch.
>>
>> Agreed and attached 0002 patch.
>
> Thanks for updating the 0001 patch and creating the 0002 patch! I've
> pushed both.
Thanks a lot!
>
>
>> Also considering when REJECT_LIMIT is specified to 1, attached patch
>> uses errmsg_plural() instead of errmsg.
>
> I don't think errmsg_plural() is needed here since, when 1 is
> specified,
> "rows" should follow "more than REJECT_LIMIT (1)". No?
You are right.
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA Group Corporation
