Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Decibel! |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error |
Date | |
Msg-id | 98DD2450-2DDE-4F90-9ABB-A2D04DF6DAA4@decibel.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Responses |
Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error
Re: [GENERAL] Surprising syntax error |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Are we still tracking beginner TODOs separately? I'm thinking this falls into that category... Barring objection, I'll mark it as easy. On Aug 21, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Added to TODO: > > Allow GRANT/REVOKE on views to use the VIEW keyword rather > than just TABLE > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-06/msg01133.php > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Marc Munro wrote: >> -- Start of PGP signed section. >>> The statement: >>> >>> revoke all on view internal.all_objects from public; >>> >>> yields a syntax error. The docs show that the word "view" is not >>> acceptable in this statement which is fine but the surprising >>> thing is >>> that: >>> >>> ? revoke all on table internal.all_objects from public; >>> >>> works fine even though all_objects is a view and not a table. >>> >>> Now that I know about it, this doesn't bother me but it was a >>> surprise >>> and I wonder whether the the parser/planner/whatever should be a bit >>> smarter about allowing the word table to apply to non-tables, and >>> whether the word view ought to be allowed. >> >> Yes, I can confirm this behavior on CVS HEAD, and it is odd: >> >> test=> CREATE SCHEMA internal; >> CREATE SCHEMA >> test=> CREATE VIEW internal.all_objects AS SELECT 1; >> CREATE VIEW >> test=> REVOKE ALL ON VIEW internal.all_objects FROM PUBLIC; >> ERROR: syntax ERROR AT OR near "internal" >> LINE 1: REVOKE ALL ON VIEW internal.all_objects FROM PUBLIC; >> ^ >> test=> REVOKE ALL ON TABLE internal.all_objects FROM PUBLIC; >> REVOKE >> >> Is there a downside to adding "VIEW" in parser/ >> gram.y:privilege_target? >> >> -- >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us >> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com >> >> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
pgsql-hackers by date: