Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 99122622434800.00550@lorc.wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 26 Dec 1999, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility.
>
> I know we have (and have for awhile) a good deal of Oracle
> compatibility...what do you mean by 'Plug-In Oracle 7 compatibility'?

Plug in Oracle compatibility would mean being able to drop a PostgreSQL server
as a replacement to an Oracle server and not having to reconfigure any clients,
rewrite any SQL, and basically not even know that the database server has been
changed.

I personally don't think that 100% drop-in Oracle Compatibility is a good goal
-- see Philip Greenspun's  Oracle Tips page at
http://photo.net/wtr/oracle-tips.html.  He also has some real good points
about LONG types and oracle CLOBs -- tips that are very worth reading, IMO.

I want my long texts to be transparent to my tcl code -- I want to index them
for speed, and I want full functionality -- I don't want CLOBS (a takeoff on
Postgres/Illustra large objects, IIANM).

....


--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Reinke
Date:
Subject: Re: Reliabilty, was [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Next
From: Howie
Date:
Subject: pgsql 7.x...