> On Jun 5, 2018, at 15:20, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I don't follow. Practically any organized group has rules around
> conduct, with varying degrees of formality, means of enforcement, etc.
I believe the objection is to setting up a separate CoC committee, rather than using the core team as the enforcement
mechanism.
This is more important than may be obvious. Having a separation of the CoC committee and the organization that sets up
andsupervises the CoC committee is very important to prevent the perception, or the fact, that the CoC enforcement
mechanismis a Star Chamber that is answerable only to itself. It also allows for an appeal mechanism.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof@thebuild.com
