Re: Postgresql over a SAN - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ericson Smith
Subject Re: Postgresql over a SAN
Date
Msg-id 9dd2faa40707260555g222a345dn690eabbff4c0ba8f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgresql over a SAN  ("Albe Laurenz" <all@adv.magwien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-general
At one point I used a SAN with a 380GB postgresql database. There were
no issues.

Great benefit? We were able to keep a hot standby servers in case the
main server went down. In that case we would just shutdown the primary
server, and start the standby one.

- Ericson Smith
W3matter LLC
http://www.w3matter.com

On 7/26/07, Albe Laurenz <all@adv.magwien.gv.at> wrote:
> Denis Gasparin wrote:
> > We're evaluating to install a SAN (Storage Area Network) and to use it
> > as storage area for our Postgresql server.
> >
> > Did anybody already make this? Problems, performance issues, tips?
>
> We use a SAN with HP EVA boxes for our PostgreSQL servers and we have
> not encountered any irregularities so far. None of our databases
> are very big or under heavy load though.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql over a SAN
Next
From: Geoffrey
Date:
Subject: Re: upgrade to 8.2.? or implement Slony, which first?