Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Artis Caune
Subject Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Date
Msg-id 9e20d71e0809240352q3c7f1478qfa2a78aac95eb6f@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)  (Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf@shopzeus.com> wrote:
> Here is my opinion: I suspect that gjournal would be much slower than
> soft updates. Also gjournal is relatively new code, not very well
> tested.

In some cases it's much faster than SU, in other a bit slower. :)
gjournal is quiet "old" code, it's already more than two years around,
and very stable. Haven't seen any gjournal related crash.





--
regards,
Artis Caune

<----. CCNA
<----|====================
<----' didii FreeBSD

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Claus Guttesen"
Date:
Subject: Re: UFS 2: soft updates vs. gjournal (AKA: Choosing a filesystem 2.)
Next
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: Different execution plan