Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly - Mailing list pgsql-rrreviewers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=0n_sbZ0XzfU2n-FCMeVaiddWT_hwK0oy3u0Te@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
List pgsql-rrreviewers
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> The Good:
> - Most patches still in play have a reviewer.

As far as I remember, there were discussions about the issue
"A patch has a reviewer, but in Needs Review state for several weeks "
in 9.0 development.

Do we have any plans for it? According to the commitfest app, one patch
has only one reviewer at once. A new reviewer might avoid reviewing
a patch that have another reviewer already.

--
Itagaki Takahiro

pgsql-rrreviewers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly