I assumed this was only going to be for 1.14 and not backpatched,
since you said previously that you expected no more than the one we
discussed before...
So if this is the pattern, I switch over to objecting in principle to
backpatching what's essentially new features (support for a new
version of the backend). Obviously no objections to the commit to
head.
//Magnus
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 05:55, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Fix PPAS package support for 9.0
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL-1_12_0_PATCHES
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=2934ca66b2dbafb80534460448c82b776e50cc3a
> Author: Nikhil S <nixmisc@gmail.com>
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> CHANGELOG | 1 +
> pgadmin/schema/edbPackage.cpp | 10 ++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
