Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From MARK CALLAGHAN
Subject Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=qc=GLstchBeTe=+F2cmnrkoeP6XRAUqN1ewy6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql  (Martin Farach-Colton <martin@tokutek.com>)
Responses Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql
Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql
List pgsql-advocacy
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Martin Farach-Colton <martin@tokutek.com> wrote:

> The B-tree bottleneck is inherent in the data structure, not a function of
> InnoDB vs postgresql vs ....
> Fractal trees do not perform disk seeks for each insertion, and they are
> therefore very good at insertions.
> Martin Farach-Colton
> Tokutek, Inc

It isn't that simple as I described earlier in this thread. InnoDB has
the insert buffer:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=insert+buffer+innodb

InnoDB can do a disk seek for each PK/unique index on a table during
an insert. It does not do disk seeks for each secondary index.

--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag@gmail.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Ken.Rosensteel@Bull.com
Date:
Subject: Postgres References
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Probable faq: need some benchmarks of pgsql vr.s mysql