On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On ons, 2010-10-13 at 23:25 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> Would anyone favor instead back-patching the documentation for the
>> 8.3, 8.2, and 8.1 branches to include mentions of these
>> previously-undocumented functions, instead? In
>> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2004-08/msg00015.php>, Tom
>> opined that they should be left undocumented, but I really don't agree
>> with that.
>
> The sets of intentionally documented and undocumented functions is part
> of the API specification of a release, and we're not changing that after
> the release, especially not when a future release ends up reverting the
> change.
I find the idea of things being intentionally undocumented quite
difficult. How is someone coming along supposed to know which things
are intentionally undocumented and which things are unintentionally
undocumented?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
