Re: scheduling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: scheduling
Date
Msg-id AANLkTiktGa9FcMHzd1pSTAFPEnHWm=z7HKgsfyHEBFnt@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to scheduling  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 20:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do we have a projected data for the next 9.0 wrap, and will it be
> beta5 or rc1?  How much should we worry about the remaining open
> items?

If we are taking a vote, I +1 for rc1 :).

> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items
>
> I am inclined to say that all three of the items currently on the list
> need to be addressed in some way before we move forward... or at least
> the last two.
>
> * ExplainOnePlan handles snapshots differently than ProcessQuery

Isn't this one not specific to 9.0?  If so I don't think it should be
a "blocker".

> * Backup procedure is wrong?

This *sounds* like a documentation bug, seems like something we can
fix while in -rc to me.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: scheduling
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch