Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jon Nelson
Subject Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimJmKx+3PZjO=7Z_d2Ts144RjnVh+RSYwfe9Aw5@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net> wrote:
>> No replies?
>>
>> This is another situation where using pread would have saved a lot of
>> time and sped things up a bit, but failing that, keeping track of the
>> file position ourselves and only lseek'ing when necessary would also
>> help. Postgresql was spending 37% of it's time in redundant lseek!
>
> 37% of cpu time?  Is that according to strace -T? how did you measure it?

Per the original post, it (redundant lseek system calls) accounted for
37% of the time spent in the kernel.

strace -f -p <pid> -c


--
Jon

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: odd postgresql performance (excessive lseek)
Next
From: Greg Spiegelberg
Date:
Subject: Re: how to get the total number of records in report