>FWIW, it isn't going to happen anyway, because the TID scan mechanism
>doesn't support scanning based on a join condition. That hasn't gotten
>to the top of the to-do list because the use case is almost vanishingly
>small. ctids generally aren't stable enough for it to be useful to
>store references to one table's ctids in another table.
Thanks for explanation.
--
------------
pasman
