> On 19 Sep 2025, at 13:05, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 19.09.25 10:22, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>> There are two things we could do. One is to simply restrict `git blame`
>> to authenticated users; this shouldn't be_too_ bad. But if we don't
>> want that, we could put the bot checker javascript tricks in front of
>> `blame`. In fact maybe we could have the best of both worlds: you get
>> the javascript check if you're not authenticated, but nothing if you
>> are. I'm not sure how easy it is to implement this though.
>
> Or just disable git blame. Who needs to run that through the website?
We could jut link to the postgres mirror on Github for that.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
