Cascading replication and archive_command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Renner
Subject Cascading replication and archive_command
Date
Msg-id BA03FD4E-0326-4717-A76C-D4FF984CDEBB@amd.co.at
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Cascading replication and archive_command
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

apparently a few users were puzzled that archive_command is ignored on slave servers, which comes as a surprise since streaming replication will work fine from slaves and as far as I’ve checked the documentation also doesn’t point out the fact that archive_command gets a different treatment.

Is this intentional or an oversight? Should this be fixed in the code (feature parity to SR) or in the documentation making this more explicit?

best,
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix initdb for path with whitespace and at char
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.4 release notes