Re: Discussion - Search Objects - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Jasmin Dizdarevic
Subject Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=HyL6nW6+LR2Ye6j+xGvS4XZwM7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Discussion - Search Objects  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Responses Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Re: Discussion - Search Objects
List pgadmin-hackers


2011/6/16 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
> because all of them modifies something.

No, see dlgFindAndReplace.

>  When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
> hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
> change the prefix if this is wished.
>

Yeah, I think it would be better.

I'm going to change that.
 

> btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
> dialog correctly?
>

Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
it in the former.

I'm currently surprised myself ;)

 
BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.
Regards.

I'll try it.

One more thing: 

Can somebody say me how to merge different patches to a single one? I've made 3-4 commits and would like to have exactly one patch file. It's not so important, but it would be very nice.

Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and help - I know this can be frustrating to answer questions, that are clear to you since a long time :)

 
--

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Next
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects