Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikj3hMK4uysAU=BFVTps7OwKUwpog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Linux: more cores = less concurrency.  (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm just doing some tests on a new server running one of our heavy select functions (the select part of a plpgsql
functionto allocate seats) concurrently.  We do use connection pooling and split out some selects to slony slaves, but
thetests here are primeraly to test what an individual server is capable of. 
>
> The new server uses 4 x 8 core Xeon X7550 CPUs at 2Ghz, our current servers are 2 x 4 core Xeon E5320 CPUs at 2Ghz.
>
> What I'm seeing is when the number of clients is greater than the number of cores, the new servers perform better on
fewercores. 

O man, I completely forgot the issue I ran into in my machines, and
that was that zone_reclaim completely screwed postgresql and file
system performance.  On machines with more CPU nodes and higher
internode cost it gets turned on automagically and destroys
performance for machines that use a lot of kernel cache / shared
memory.

Be sure and use sysctl.conf to turn it off:

vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dieter Rehbein
Date:
Subject: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Next
From: Lucas Madar
Date:
Subject: Poor performance when joining against inherited tables